- Covid-19 vaccination: Ondo govt to ban workers from Nov. 1
- Implications of Nnamdi Kanu’s prosecution by Buhari’s govt —Afenifere
- Just In: Court convicts NSCDC officer for using fake Certificate
- Federal Poly, Ileoluji holds First Matric for Akure Centre students, SIWES orientation Oct 21
- EndSARS Memorial Day: Peaceful protest in Akure as Police Boss reacts
Musa Maiyaki, an ex-Director General of Nigeria Television Authority, NTA, in his evidence in court today, said he authorized the programme ‘INSIGHT’ to be aired on NTA “pro bono” as Corporate Social Responsibility.
He however admitted on further cross-examination, that Dr Okupe funded payments for personnel, resource persons and production charges for the programme, maintaining that it was only the airtime that was not paid for by the office of the special assistant to the President on public affairs.
He also denied knowledge of budget proposals and other letter which was written by Sola Atere, on behalf of the NTA, to Dr Okupe.
This is a complete contradiction of Mr Sola Atere’s evidence who admitted he wrote the letter containing the budget proposal and he signed it.
Mr Tolu Babaleye, counsel to the second defendant, put it across to Mr Maiyaki that while he, Maiyaki, approved the memo for the programme to be aired free, his staff including Sola Atere, Mr Iorhen Kwange; the producer of the programme,and Mrs Onobu Ikwubiela; a marketing officer in the DG’s office went behind him to collect money from Dr Okupe for sundry expenses for the programme.
Counsel for Dr Okupe, Mr Akin Akingbade from JK Gadzama chambers also informed Mr Maiyaki that Mrs Onobu was in fact a director of Ikonac Nigeria LTD, the company whose account was submitted by the producer to the office of the Senior Special Assistant to the President on public affairs, and to which part of the first quarterly payments of 3,030,000 was paid into.
This fact had previously been confirmed by the statement of account of messrs Value Trust Investment LTD, which showed that Ikonac Nigeria LTD was credited with the same amount on 17/10/2013.
Maiyaki responded that he was quite surprised to learn about all these, as he was just hearing of the information.
On further cross-examination by the counsel to the third defendant, Mr Ezenwa Ibegbunam, Maiyaki admitted that the memo approving the Pro Bono status for the programme was not communicated to Dr Okupe or his office by his subordinates, as no record for this exists.
The case continues on Thursday 18 April, 2019.